Lander et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
| Peter E. Lander, The Estate of Mimi J. Lander, The Children of Mimi J. Lander and The Children of Peter E. Lander |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co., James Dimon and Marianne Lake |
| 4:2016cv00116 |
| February 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Collin |
| Christine A. Nowak |
| Amos L. Mazzant |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, 61 Report and Recommendations for 30 Plaintiffs' Motion of Augmentation to Plaintiffs' First Amended Motion to Remand, filed by Peter E. Lander, The Estate of Mimi J. Lander, 28 First Amended Motion to Remand filed by Peter E. Lander, 20 Motion to Remand filed by Peter E. Lander, The Estate of Mimi J. Lander, 29 Plaintiffs' Motion Challenging Removal and Jurisdiction, filed by Pet er E. Lander, The Estate of Mimi J. Lander. ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Dkt. #20), Plaintiffs' First Amended Motion to Remand (Dkt. #28), Plaintiffs' Motion Challenging Removal and Jurisdiction (Dkt. #29), and Plaintiffs' Motion of Augmentation to Plaintiffs' First Amended Motion to Remand (Dkt. #30) are DENIED.. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/7/2016. (kls, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
