De Los Reyes v. Target Corporation
| Gary De Los Reyes |
| Target Corporation |
| 4:2023cv00616 |
| June 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Target Corporation, filed by Gary De Los Reyes.(Lewis, Kern) |
Filing 10
ORDER. The Court ORDERS that, by no later than Tuesday, August 22, 2023, Plaintiff must file a second amended complaint that alleges facts sufficient to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 8/15/2023. (jmb)
|
| Filing 9 Defendant's Amended ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint by Target Corporation.(Peavler, Donna) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Target Corporation, filed by Gary De Los Reyes.(Lewis, Kern) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER. The Court ORDERS that, by no later than Friday, August 11, 2023, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint that alleges facts sufficient to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 07/31/2023. (jmb)
|
| Filing 6 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Target Corporation (Peavler, Donna) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Target Corporation.(Peavler, Donna) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gary De Los Reyes. Target Corporation served on 7/3/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. (Lewis, Kern) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Target Corporation. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document:. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s) Summons)(Lewis, Kern) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9578130.), filed by Gary De Los Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lewis, Kern) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (rpc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: De Los Reyes v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gary De Los Reyes | |
| Represented By: | Kern Allen Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Donna Cay Peavler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
