Westerby v. TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Charles Westerby
Respondent: TDCJ-CID and Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 5:2019cv00004
Filed: January 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Caroline Craven
Referring Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2019 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Charles Westerby on 03/01/2019 as to #5 Report and Recommendations. (lfs, )
February 15, 2019 Filing 6 Request from Charles Westerby for another copy of order. (Clerk resent copy of R & R (#5) and copy of docket sheet.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s)) (lfs, )
January 30, 2019 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Westerby. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 01/30/19. (lfs, )
January 24, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Attorney General to Call by Charles Westerby. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(lfs, )
January 22, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and Request for copy of Local Rules by Charles Westerby. (Local Rules mailed to Mr. Westerby.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(lfs, )
January 14, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Westerby. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s), #2 Exhibit Notice from Court of Criminal Appeals of TX)(lfs, )
January 10, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (No filing fee or motion for IFP received), filed by Charles Westerby. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(lfs, )
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order STANDING ORDER REFERRING PRISONER CASES to Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 01/10/19. (lfs, )
January 10, 2019 Prose Guidelines, including information regarding informing court of changes of address, sent to Petitioner per Magistrate Judge Craven. (lfs, )
January 10, 2019 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (lfs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Westerby v. TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Westerby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?