Crocker v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: Brandon Earl Crocker
Defendant: Larry Smith, Jacob Putman, Southern Health Partners, Matthew Pool and Unknown Phariss
Case Number: 6:2021cv00046
Filed: January 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: J Campbell Barker
Referring Judge: K Nicole Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TO REPLEAD re #1 Complaint filed by Brandon Earl Crocker. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of this Order to file a second amended complaint on the standardized 1983 lawsuit form for prisoners. ORDERED that the Clerk shall not accept any other documents in this case, except for a motion for an extension of time, until the Plaintiff complies with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 3/19/2021. (gsg)
March 9, 2021 Partial Filing fee paid per court order: $8.00, Pay.Gov import number 629257 (maj, )
February 26, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION for Subpoena by Brandon Earl Crocker. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(mll, )
February 26, 2021 Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Brandon Earl Crocker.(mll, )
February 22, 2021 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Brandon Earl Crocker as to #6 Order. Received 2/9/2021. (ndc)
February 11, 2021 Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Brandon Earl Crocker as to #5 Order Re Collection and Payment of Full Filing Fee. Received 2/5/2021. (ndc)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that Plaintiff shall have 30 days from receipt of this Order to file an amended complaint showing that he has a basis for a potentially meritorious civil rights lawsuit. The Clerk shall not accept any other documents in this case, except for a motion for an extension of time, until the Plaintiff complies with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 02/02/21. (mll, )
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER RE COLLECTION AND PAYMENT OF FULL FILING FEE. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is not required to pay an initial partial filing fee. The agency having custody of the Plaintiff shall deduct 20% of each deposit made to the Plaintiff's inmate trust account and forward payments to the Court on a regular basis. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 02/02/21. (mll, )
January 29, 2021 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, )
January 28, 2021 Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K Nicole Mitchell. (mll, )
January 28, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Earl Crocker. (mll, )
January 28, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT by Brandon Earl Crocker re #1 Complaint (mll, )
January 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unknown Phariss, Matthew Pool, Jacob Putman, Larry Smith, Southern Health Partners, filed by Brandon Earl Crocker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope(s))(mll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crocker v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacob Putman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern Health Partners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Pool
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Phariss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Earl Crocker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?