Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kohute v. U.S. Patent Office et al
as 1:2026cv00371
Defendant:
Larry R. Smith, U.S. Patent Office, Jacob Putman and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2025cv00526
Plaintiff:
Aphonso Thomas
Defendant:
State of Texas, Kerry L Russell, Jacob Putman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Russell et al
as 6:2026cv00178
Plaintiff:
Aphonso Thomas
Defendant:
Judge Kerry L Russell, D.A. Jacob Putman and Attorney Edward Estrada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Russell et al
as 4:2025cv01244
Plaintiff:
Aphonso Thomas
Defendant:
Judge Kerry L Russell, D.A. Jacob Putman and Attorney Edward Estrada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. State of Texas
as 3:2025cv02949
Plaintiff:
Aphonso Thomas
Defendant:
State of Texas, Kerry L Russell, Jacob Putman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Putman et al
as 6:2025cv00423
Plaintiff:
Edward Hill
Defendant:
Jacob Putman and Michael West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kohute v. Craver et al
as 4:2025cv01042
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute
Defendant:
FNU Craver, Sheriff Larry R Smith, District Attorney Jacob Putman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fund Texas Choice v. Deski
as 25-50563
Plaintiff:
Fund Texas Choice, North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant:
Richard E. Glaser, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Boggess v. Chamness et al
as 6:2025cv00064
Plaintiff:
Larysa Boggess
Defendant:
T. Heath Chamness and Jacob Putman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Warren
as 24-40599
Defendant:
Jacob Putman, District Attorney, Kris Davis, Detective, Don Warren, Mayor and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl L. Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.