Carroll v. United Texas Medical Branch et al
| Lannette Linthecum, Unknown Aputa, Sabrina Rogers-Fite, Skylar Patton MHL, TDCJ and United Texas Medical Branch |
| James Charles Carroll, Sr |
| 6:2026cv00535 |
| November 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| K. Nicole Mitchell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case: 6:26-cv-00535-KNM Carroll v. United Texas Medical Branch et al was filed on 11/5/2026 and assigned to Judge Mitchell. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached Pro Se Instructions and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge are sent to Pro Se.) (gsm) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by James Charles Carroll, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gsm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by James Charles Carroll, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gsm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Discovery by James Charles Carroll, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gsm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Charles Carroll, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Financial Information)(gsm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (fee not paid), filed by James Charles Carroll, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(gsm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
