Cases 1 - 10 of 13,601
Monk v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2025cv00102
Petitioner:
Everick L. Monk
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2025cv00357
Petitioner:
Gary Harold Green
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lyon, Jr. v. Director-TDCJ-CID
as 5:2025cv00088
Petitioner:
Edward Lyon, Jr.
Respondent:
Director-TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hood v. Collier et al
as 1:2025cv00346
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Hood
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bruce Fredricks, Stacey Ebner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Binder v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2025cv00685
Petitioner:
Willie Ray Binder, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poest v. Executive Director, TCCC
as 5:2025cv00140
Petitioner:
Calvin Poest
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2025cv01655
Petitioner:
Omar Alberto Ramirez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2025cv00184
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2025cv00691
Petitioner:
Daryl Christopher Simmons
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rou v. John Sealy Hospital Director et al
as 1:2025cv01022
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Rou, Sr.
Defendant:
John Sealy Hospital Director and TDCJ Dominguez Unit Head Medical Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
