Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bradshaw v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2026cv02181
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Bradshaw
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briggs v. Guerrero-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2026cv00973
Petitioner:
Marcellus Demetric Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. TDCJ-CID
as 4:2026cv01026
Petitioner:
Clinton E. Neal
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cross v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2026cv00953
Petitioner:
Arthur Gilmer Cross, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esquivel v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2026cv00167
Petitioner:
Juan Esquivel, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2026cv00176
Petitioner:
Albert Valdez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones, III v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2026cv06296
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vandewege v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2026cv00956
Petitioner:
Craig Alan Vandewege
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fernandez-Lopez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2026cv00372
Petitioner:
Nelson Isac Fernandez-Lopez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2026cv00971
Petitioner:
Tyrico Simpson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
