Cases 1 - 10 of 13,114
Pacheco v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00672
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Jesus Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01892
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Anthony Rashad George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Frank Alonzo Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Smith County et al
as 1:2024cv04000
Plaintiff:
Dude Hicks and Larry Hicks
Defendant:
TDCJ, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Smith County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Jones v. Director
as 1:2024cv00288
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luster v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
George Daniel Luster, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plemons v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00155
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Paul Gene Plemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dawson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01820
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Timmy Antonio Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 9:2024cv00130
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Bryan Collier
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarber v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv02619
Defendant:
Bridgette Hays, Craig Schmidt, Frederick L Gooden and others
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE TARBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
