Perez v. Sells et al
| Roberto Perez |
| Asst Warden Edward B. Sells, Leana C Combs, Michael Dees, Stephan D Dean, Williams B Dean and FNU Thomas |
| 9:2021cv00292 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Ron Clark |
| Thad Heartfield |
| Christine L Stetson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER transferring case to District Judge Thad Heartfield for all further proceedings. District Judge Ron Clark no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 12/31/2021. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Roberto Perez on 12/22/2021 re #3 Order. (bjc, ) |
Filing 3
PRELIMINARY FILING FEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 12/14/21. (ljw, )
|
| Case transferred in from Beaumont Division on 11/29/2021. Case Number 1:21-cv-572. (ljw, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. (ljw, ) |
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER that this civil rights action is transferred to the Lufkin Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of TX. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 11/29/2021. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Roberto Perez.(bjc, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.