Perez v. Glover et al
Roberto Perez |
Heather Glover, CO III Unknown Perez, Unknown Sells, Bobby Lumpkin and Stephan D Dean |
9:2022cv00080 |
May 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Zack Hawthorn |
Thad Heartfield |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT that this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 USC 1983 is dismissed pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g). All relief not previously granted is denied. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 7/7/2022. (bjc, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's #2 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 9/7/2022. (bjc, ) |
Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Roberto Perez on 6/7/22 as to #2 Report and Recommendations. (ljw, ) |
Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Roberto Perez.This civil action should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff chooses not to proceed in forma pauperis, he may submit the full filing fee of $402.00 and the Report and Recommendation will be withdrawn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 5/31/22. (ljw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights) against All Defendants, filed by Roberto Perez.(ljw, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (ljw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.