Calderon Sanchez v. Noem et al
| Jose Maikel Calderon Sanchez |
| Kristi Noem, Pamela Bondi, Timothy Lyons, Gabriel Martinez and Alexander Sanchez |
| 9:2026cv00187 |
| March 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Michael J Truncale |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. All pending motions are denied as moot. This constitutes a Final Judgment and the Clerk is instructed to close this matter. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 4/7/2026. (SCM)
|
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Petition for habeas corpus filed by Jose Maikel Calderon Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 summons bondi, #2 summons martinez, #3 summons noem, #4 summons lyons, #5 summons sanchez)(Garza, Baldomero) |
| Case: Calderon Sanchez v. Noem et al was filed on 3/9/26 and assigned to Judge Truncale. (ljw) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (ljw) |
| Filing 1 FIRST PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2241 ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXEDC-11411404.), filed by Jose Maikel Calderon Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit NTA Pet 01, #3 Errata Motion to terminate Pet 02, #4 Exhibit ij denial on motion Pet 03, #5 Exhibit Petitioner Address Pet 04)(Garza, Baldomero) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.