Horton v. SM Energy Company et al
| Brandon Horton |
| SM Energy Company and Michael Ramirez |
| 1:2021cv00221 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
FINAL JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the Court's order on February 3, 2022, Dkt. No. #14 , it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this suit is dismissed without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 2/4/2022) (jak)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER. Plaintiff Brandon Horton seeks to voluntarily dismiss his claims against SM Energy Company and Michael Ramirez without prejudice. Dkt. No. #7 . The defendants oppose Horton's motion, arguing that they will suffer plain legal prejudice if the motion is granted. Dkt. No. #12 . Finding that they will not, the Court grants Horton's motion and dismisses this case without prejudice. All remaining motions are denied as moot. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 2/3/2022) (jak)
|
| Filing 13 REPLY (docketed as Brief/Memorandum in Support)(Plaintiff's Reply in Support of his Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Claims Against Defendants Without Prejudice) filed by Brandon Horton re: #12 Response by SM Energy Company to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Voluntarily Without Prejudice (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Reply Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit(s) Appendix) (Stam, Charles) Modified docket text per instruction from filer (Marla/Charles Stam) 1/18/2022 (amg). |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by SM Energy Company re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss Voluntarily Without Prejudice (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff''s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Claims, #2 Proposed Order Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to voluntarily Dismiss Claims) (Jett, M) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave from Requirement of Local Counsel filed by SM Energy Company with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for Leave from Requirement of Local Counsel, #2 Proposed Order Order Granting Motion for Leave) (Jett, M) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER. Before the Court is the Notice of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures purportedly filed under Rule 26(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 9. These disclosures, as with much of discovery, should not be filed with the Court. The Court instructs the Clerk to strike the Notice of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures and related attachments Dkt. Nos. 9; 9-1; 9-2; 9-3; 9-4; 9-5; 9-6; 9-7). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 1/7/2022) (amg)
|
| Filing 9 **STRIKEN per Order at #10 ** NOTICE of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures filed by Brandon Horton (Attachments: #1 Records, #2 Records, #3 Records, #4 Records, #5 Records, #6 Photos, #7 Osha Docs) (Stam, Charles) Modified on 1/7/2022 (amg). |
| Filing 8 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Brandon Horton re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Voluntarily Without Prejudice (Stam, Charles) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Voluntarily Without Prejudice filed by Brandon Horton (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stam, Charles) |
| Filing 6 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Brandon Horton re #5 MOTION For Leave From Requirement of Local Counsel Pursuant to Local Rule 83.10 (Stam, Charles) |
| Filing 5 MOTION For Leave From Requirement of Local Counsel Pursuant to Local Rule 83.10 filed by Brandon Horton (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stam, Charles) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by SM Energy Company identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc. for SM Energy Company. (Jett, M) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED Civil Cover Sheet (Jett, M) Modified on 12/13/2021 to reflect title of document per filer's instructions (jak). |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (jak) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by SM Energy Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12446277) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT 1, #2 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT 2, #3 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT 3, #4 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT 4, #5 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT 5, #6 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT 6) (Jett, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
