Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv04850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ramirez v. Stephens et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Defendant:
Jefferson County Correctional Facility Staff and Sheriff Zena Stephens
Plaintiff:
Kane Michael Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez et al v. Amazon Logistics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024xc02871
Plaintiff:
Joe Michael Ramirez and Traci Carol Ramirez
Defendant:
Kriminal Inc, Khurshid Eshimov, Amazon Logistics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ramirez et al v. Amazon Logistics Inc et al
as 3:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Traci Carol Ramirez and Joe Michael Ramirez
Defendant:
Khurshid Eshimov, Nosir Tursunov, Kriminal Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ramirez v. City of Texas City
as 3:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramirez
Defendant:
The City of Texas City, Texas and City of Texas City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06603
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valdiviezo et al v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02526
Plaintiff:
Luz Valdiviezo and Michael Ramirez
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and Accurate Personnel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18604
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramirez v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramirez
Defendant:
Lake County Montana, Donald Bell, Ben Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
