Wiley v. Weston et al
| Charles R Wiley |
| NFN Weston, Linda Richey, NFN Davis, NFN Sutton, NFN Mayberry, Director of Texas Dept of Crim Justice, NFN Maybry, NFN Vacio, NFN Foxworth, NFN Goff and John and Jane # Doe |
| 2:2008cv00171 |
| September 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Potter |
| Clinton E Averitte |
| Mary Lou Robinson |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Order Adopting 11 Report and Recommendation and Overruling 12 Objections to Report and Recommendation. Ordered that this Civil Rights Complaint is Dismissed Without Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief Can be Granted and With Prejudice as Frivolous. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 11/7/08) (djs)
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Recommending that the Civil Rights Complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted and with prejudice as frivolous. Further recommending that the Court decline to exercise jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims and that such claims be dismissed without prejudice. Objections due within 14 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Clinton E Averitte on 10/22/08) (djs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
