Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Smith v Dept of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services
as 6:2022cv02256
Plaintiff:
Khammesherma Smith, Kham Smith and Khamesher Smith
Defendant:
The Dept of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, Antonio Hickman, NFN Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hays v. Dallas County Jail
as 5:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Rosablanca Hays and Rosablanca Monique Hayes
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail, CO NFN Lewis, CO NFN Boyero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, Jr v. Davis
as 3:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Jones, Jr
Defendant:
NFN Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01073
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00827
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jones v. Cooksey et al
as 9:2020cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
NFN Davis, K Hu, K Cooksey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Cooksey et al
as 3:2020cv00339
Respondent:
K Hu, NFN Davis, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chris Wooten v. Texas Tech Mental-Medical Svc, et al
as 20-10141
Defendant / Appellee:
NFN DAVIS, Warden, NFN VEECH, C. O., MIKE JONES, Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS WOOTEN, also known as Christopher Bennett Wooten
Patricio Estrada v. Director, TDCJ-CID, et al
as 5:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Ms. NFN Davis, Ms. NFN Williams, Mr. NFN Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davis et al
as 5:2019cv00174
Defendant:
Officer NFN Smith, Officer NFN Esquivel, Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Tyson Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
