Heslep v. Stephens
Plaintiff: Matthew Mark Heslep
Defendant: Williams Stephens
Case Number: 2:2017cv00084
Filed: May 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Amarillo Office
County: Potter
Presiding Judge: Clinton E. Averitte
Presiding Judge: Mary Lou Robinson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER adopting 26 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER re: 18 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order; and denying 18 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Matthew Mark Heslep. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/7/2019) (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heslep v. Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Mark Heslep
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Williams Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?