Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Heslep v. TDCJ Clements Unit et al
as 2:2021cv00206
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Heslep
Defendant:
TDCJ Clements Unit, FNU Barris and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heslep v. Abbott et al
as 2:2019cv00036
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Heslep and Matthew Dillion
Defendant:
D Nash, R Pool, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heslep v. Remerez et al
as 2:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Heslep
Defendant:
L Remerez, Jacob D Williams, Leeroy Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heslep v. Stephens
as 2:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Heslep
Defendant:
Williams Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heslep v. Stephens et al
as 2:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Heslep
Defendant:
William Stephens, Shane Hembree, Alfreda Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Heslep v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 15-20686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW MARK HESLEP
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, WILLIAM STEPHENS, GREG ABBOTT and others
Heslep v. Thaler et al
as 4:2015cv02595
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Heslep
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, William Stephens, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Heslep v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-50553
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW MARK HESLEP
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Matthew Heslep v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-10464
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW MARK HESLEP
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Heslep v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2012cv00249
Petitioner:
Matthew Mark Heslep
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
