Weatherly v. Collier et al
| Rohn Michael Weatherly |
| Brian Collier, Adam R Gonzales, Wade T Alexander, Teresa S Martinez, Alan Sbar, Michelle Ruiz, Harini Chitta, Felicia Cornelison, Susana Hernandes and Diana Keffer |
| 2:2022cv00060 |
| March 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Lee Ann Reno |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #3 Petition for Writ of Mandamus by Plaintiff Rohn Michael Weatherly. (djs) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. First page of Document 3 included in mailing. Tue Mar 15 12:02:35 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Rohn Michael Weatherly. (Attachments: #1 List of Parties) (daa) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (Attachments: #1 General Order Concerning Litigation) (daa) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
