Cases 1 - 10 of 349
Fountain v. Rupert
as 24-40267
Plaintiff:
Freddie Fountain, and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
John Rupert, Warden, Coffield Unit, Brian Collier, Executive Director, Jeffrey Richardson, Assistant Warden and others
Sossamon v. State of Texas
as 24-10315
Plaintiff:
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III
Defendant:
Lonestar State of Texas, E.F. Hazelwood, Adezyanju Fadeyen, Chaplain, Alred Unit and others
Clark v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Reginald Lee Clark
Respondent:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bodwin v. Collier
as 24-40213
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clyde Bodwin
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Juan M. Garcia, Michael O. McNeil and others
Taylor v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 7:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
John H. Taylor
Defendant:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director, Kevin Smith and Kareem Hayekco IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmett et al v. LNU et al
as 6:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett, Laron Wood, Herre Davis and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, TDC Corporation, Brian Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frosch v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
George Edward Frosch
Respondent:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duke v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tim L Duke
Defendant:
Brian Collier and Warden Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sossamon v. Collier
as 7:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III
Respondent:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rehart v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Steven G Rehart
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Officer K Smith, FNU LNU #1 6:24-CV-011 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
