Cases 1 - 10 of 305
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
Nicholas David Mosquera
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Brett Ligon, Law Librarian Lovelady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Reginald Lee Clark
Respondent:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 7:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
John H. Taylor
Defendant:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director, Kevin Smith and Kareem Hayekco IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmett et al v. LNU et al
as 6:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett, Laron Wood, Herre Davis and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, TDC Corporation, Brian Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frosch v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
George Edward Frosch
Respondent:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duke v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tim L Duke
Defendant:
Brian Collier and Warden Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sossamon v. Collier
as 7:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III
Respondent:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rehart v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Steven G Rehart
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Officer K Smith, FNU LNU #1 6:24-CV-011 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
