Drake v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
| Eric Drake |
| Costco Wholesale Corporation, Walter Craig Jelinek, John C Sullivan, Costco Wholesale Membership Inc, Timothy Donald Cook, Apple Inc, Breitling USA Inc and Thierry Prissert |
| 2:2024cv00055 |
| March 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice that the clerk has been instructed to apply the sanction order to the submissions indexed under number: 2:24-CV-055-Z. The sanction order was originally filed in: USCA5 20-40492, 21-10248, 21-10797 and states: USCA5 Imposed monetary sanctions against Eric Drake (No document created): Drake shall be required to pay a sanction in the amount of $2000, payable to the clerk of this court. He shall be barred from filing or prosecuting any motion, action, or appeal in this court or any court subject to this court's jurisdiction, until he has paid the sanction. Even after paying the sanction, Drake shall be permanently enjoined from filing or prosecuting any civil appeal, motion, or action in this court...without first receiving permission from the forum court...The clerk of this court and the clerks of all courts subject to the jurisdiction of this court shall be directed to return to Drake, unfiled, any attempted submission until Drake has complied with the sanction order. Drake shall be required to pay a sanction in the amount of $2000, payable to the clerk of this court. He shall be barred from filing or prosecuting any motion, action, or appeal in this court or any court subject to this court's jurisdiction, until he has paid the sanction. Even after paying the sanction, Drake shall be permanently enjoined from filing or prosecuting any civil appeal, motion, or action in this court without first receiving permission from the forum court. The clerk of this court and the clerks of all courts subject to the jurisdiction of this court shall be directed to return to Drake, unfiled, any attempted submission until Drake has complied with the sanction order. [20-40492, 21-10248, 21-10797]. That order prohibits the filing of a case, so the number assigned to this closed matter remains for indexing purposes only. (awc) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eric Drake. (awc) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT re #2 Complaint, filed by Eric Drake. (awc) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Eric Drake. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Forms) (awc) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) (awc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. (Copy of first page of ECF #2 and public docket sheet mailed.) Fri Mar 22 15:44:36 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
