Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Drake v. Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. et al
as 3:2026mc00075
Petitioner:
Eric Drake
Respondent:
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. and Amy Phillips
Cause Of Action: Petition to Perpetuate Testimony
Drake v. Federation Internationale De Football Association et al
as 1:2026cv24218
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Federation Internationale De Football Association, FIFA U.S. Legal & Compliance, Inc., Gianni Infantino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Rolling Suds Inc et al
as 4:2026cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Rolling Suds Inc, LHW Horizon LLC a Texas Limited Liability Company doing business as Rolling Suds of Dallas-Irving, TippeTop Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Moore et al
as 4:2026cv04544
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
William G. Moore, III, Blake Hawthorne, Warren Vavra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Drake v. Uknown Defendant (4:26-CV-368-O)
as 4:2026cv00368
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Uknown Defendant (4:26-CV-368-O)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. EBAY, Inc. et al
as 5:2025mc80391
Petitioner:
Eric Drake
Respondent:
EBAY, Inc., Samantha Wellington and Cornelius Boone
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Drake v. State Bar of Texas et al
as 1:2025cv02056
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
State Bar of Texas, Ervin Apffel, III, Commission for Lawyer Discipline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Drake v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 25-3035
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Eric Drake v. Rolling Suds Services, LLC, et al
as 25-5996
Petitioner:
ERIC DRAKE
Respondent:
ROLLING SUDS SERVICES, LLC and AARON HARPER
Eric Drake v. Rolling Suds Services, LLC, et al
as 25-5886
Petitioner:
ERIC DRAKE
Respondent:
ROLLING SUDS SERVICES, LLC and AARON HARPER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
