Birge v. Astrue

Birge v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Anthony James Birge
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	3:2012cv01777
Filed:	June 8, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Johnson
Presiding Judge:	A. Joe Fish
Presiding Judge:	Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 10, 2014	Filing 20 Order Adopting 19 Findings and Recommendation of the United State Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, plaintiff's 16 motion for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, filed 4/19/2013 is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff is hereb y awarded $4,474.83 in attorney's fees, based on 25.10 hours of attorney work at an hourly rate of $178.28, and reimbursable costs in the amount of $350 from the Judgment Fund. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 1/10/2014) (axm)
September 30, 2013	Filing 14 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 13 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 10 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael J. Astrue, 9 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Anthony James Birge. It is therefore ORDERED tha t the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, filed 9/19/2012 (docket entry 9), is hereby GRANTED in part; defendant's motion for summary judgment, filed 10/19/2012 (docket entry 10), is hereby DENIED; and the case is REMANDED to theCommissioner for further proceedings. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/30/2013) (tla)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 10, 2014

Filing 20 Order Adopting 19 Findings and Recommendation of the United State Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, plaintiff's 16 motion for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, filed 4/19/2013 is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff is hereb y awarded $4,474.83 in attorney's fees, based on 25.10 hours of attorney work at an hourly rate of $178.28, and reimbursable costs in the amount of $350 from the Judgment Fund. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 1/10/2014) (axm)

September 30, 2013

Filing 14 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 13 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 10 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael J. Astrue, 9 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Anthony James Birge. It is therefore ORDERED tha t the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, filed 9/19/2012 (docket entry 9), is hereby GRANTED in part; defendant's motion for summary judgment, filed 10/19/2012 (docket entry 10), is hereby DENIED; and the case is REMANDED to theCommissioner for further proceedings. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/30/2013) (tla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Birge v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony James Birge
Represented By:	Dominick Bonino
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?