Flowers v. Thomas et al
| Shirley A Flowers |
| David Hobden, Vincent Timmons, DART, Jacob James, Kathy Phillips, Anthony Ragins, Kenneth Day, Gary C Thomas and ATU |
| 3:2019cv01355 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Labor: Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This action should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and for lack of prosecution. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 7/25/2019) (zkc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 8. Thu Jul 25 16:44:10 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed Jul 24 16:30:04 CDT 2019 (crt) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER ACCEPTING #5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's 4 Motion for Emergency Restraining Order and Injunctive Relief is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/23/2019) (rekc)
|
|
Filing 6
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint specifying her legal claims in compliance with Rule 8(a); submit either a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or payment of the $400.00 fee; and register to use the Courts electronic filing system. Plaintiff's failure to fully comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 6/24/2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 6/7/2019) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 5
FINDING, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Plaintiff's motion for an emergency restraining order and injunctive relief should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 6/7/2019) (mcrd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Fri Jun 7 16:33:34 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Jun 7 16:33:13 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (please see doc. #1 for image) filed by Shirley A Flowers. (ndt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against ATU, DART, Kenneth Day, David Hobden, Jacob James, Kathy Phillips, Anthony Ragins, Gary C Thomas, Vincent Timmons filed by Shirley A Flowers. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
