Cases 1 - 10 of 100
WATTS v. GONYO et al
as 3:2026cv00088
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WATTS
Defendant:
BRIAN GONYO, DART TRANSIT COMPANY and JOHN DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Davis v. Gubster et al
as 1:2026cv08841
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Brian Davis
Defendant:
Jane Gubster, Thomas Dart, Collins and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dart et al
as 1:2026cv08868
Petitioner:
Jason Jones
Respondent:
Tom Dart
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rendon v. Kampe et al
as 1:2026cv08758
Plaintiff:
Alberto A. Rendon
Defendant:
Linda Kampe, Cermak Health Services, Dr. Augustine and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornhill v. Dart et al
as 1:2026cv08657
Plaintiff:
Domonique Michelle Thornhill
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Officer McDonald, Unknown Cook County Sheriff Deputies (John Does 1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neubert v. Dart Transit Company
as 5:2026cv04275
Plaintiff:
Charles Neubert
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Stanford v. Brooks et al
as 1:2026cv07951
Plaintiff:
Cory R Stanford
Defendant:
Sgt. Brooks, Sheriff Officer WIlerson and Sheriff Tom Dart
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Delaware Area Regional Transit Corp. (Dart)
as 1:2026cv00810
Plaintiff:
Scott Walker
Defendant:
Delaware Area Regional Transit Corp. (DART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Dart et al
as 1:2026cv07734
Plaintiff:
Terrell Gordon
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Bautista
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trimble v. Dart
as 1:2026cv07705
Plaintiff:
Raymond Trimble
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
