Cases 1 - 10 of 5,845
Whitfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03795
Petitioner:
Lawrence Whitfield
Respondent:
Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525] et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Darell Williams
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525], Fleetline doing business as Dart Transit Company, Quantrez Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bogan v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03799
Plaintiff:
Leah Bogan
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brinson v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03741
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Brinson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rogers v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03739
Plaintiff:
Kavarian Rogers
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hicks v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03701
Plaintiff:
Yarnell Hicks
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and CCDOC Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dear v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03712
Plaintiff:
Cassius Dear
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balzan v. CCDOC et al
as 1:2024cv03720
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Reyes Balzan
Defendant:
CCDOC, Tom Dart and CCDOC Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nefer Neb v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03787
Plaintiff:
Ken Nefer Neb and Darrell McKee
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, John or Jane Doe, Iris Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
