Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
| Benjamin Davis |
| Brad Livingston, NFN Martinez, Phillips Sifuentes, NFN Furr, Brian Collier, NFN Putnam and Director, TDCJ-CID |
| 3:2019cv03052 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| David L Horan |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Acknowledgment Of Service re: Clerk's Notice of Electronic Mailing, #9 Judgment, #8 Order Accepting/Adopting Findings and Recommendations to the Office of Texas Attorney General. (ndt) |
Filing 9
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases without prejudice to Petitioner's right to fully and properly exhaust state court remedies. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/18/2020) (ykp)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER ACCEPTING #6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/18/2020) (ykp)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8,9. Tue Feb 18 16:49:26 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Clerk's Notice of Electronic Mailing re #9 Judgment, #8 Order Accepting/Adopting Findings and Recommendations to the Office of Texas Attorney General. (ykp) |
| Filing 7 Service on Texas Attorney General (svc) |
| Acknowledgment of Electronic Service from the Office of Attorney General of Texas re #6 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 Consent Form, #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ykp) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Jan 9 09:45:17 CST 2020 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should dismiss the habeas application under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases without prejudice to Daviss right to fully exhaust his state court remedies. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 1/8/2020) (svc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE filed by Benjamin Davis. (ykp) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri Dec 27 14:11:32 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Benjamin Davis. (oyh) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Benjamin Davis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (oyh) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (oyh) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
