Foster v. Target Corporation et al
| Diana B Foster |
| Target, Target Corporation and Target Store #1489 |
| 3:2020cv00306 |
| February 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Agreed Upon Mediator filed by Target Corporation. (Lee, Michael) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Target Corporation. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Lee, Michael) |
| Filing 15 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Target Corporation re #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Lee, Michael) |
| Filing 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Target Corporation (Lee, Michael) |
Filing 13
PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 3/13/2020) (ctf)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lee, Michael) |
|
Filing 11
***VACATED PER THE DIRECTION OF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE***ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: After reviewing the papers and pleadings on file, the Court notes that Plaintiff's counsel, Hilary Cochrane, is not admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Therefore, on or before Wednesday, 3/18/2020, Ms. Cochrane must either become admitted to practice in this District (see LR 83.7), or move the Court to be admitted Pro Hac Vice (see LR 83.9(b)). Failure to do so may result in sanctions. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 3/9/2020) (ctf) Modified on 3/9/2020 (ctf).
|
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial beginning 3/1/2021 before Judge Jane J. Boyle. Joinder of Parties due by 4/1/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 4/1/2020. Motions due by 11/16/2020. Discovery due by 10/15/2020. Deadline for mediation is on or before 10/2/2020. Pretrial Order due by 2/15/2021. Pretrial Materials due by 2/15/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 2/26/2021 10:00 AM before Judge Jane J. Boyle. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 3/3/2020) (ndt)
|
| Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Target Corporation. (Lee, Michael) |
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER finding as moot #2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim in light of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7). (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 2/27/2020) (chmb)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Target Corporation filed by Diana B Foster. (One or more defendant(s) is no longer named.) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Rogers, Hilary) |
|
Filing 6
STATUS REPORT ORDER: Status Report due by 3/3/2020. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 2/11/2020) (svc)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand filed by Target, Target Corporation, Target Store #1489 (Lee, Michael) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cdt) |
| Filing 3 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Target Corporation re #2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Lee, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Target Corporation (Lee, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 134th District Court, Dallas County, case number DC-20-00598 filed by Target Corporation. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10605009) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A Index, #2 Exhibit(s) B State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit(s) C Tab 1 Original Petition, #4 Exhibit(s) C Tab 2 Citation and Return Target Corp, #5 Exhibit(s) C Tab 3 Citation and Return Target, #6 Exhibit(s) C Tab 4 Citation and Return Target Store, #7 Exhibit(s) C Tab 5 DWOP Notice, #8 Exhibit(s) D Certificate of Interested Persons, #9 Cover Sheet, #10 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Cain, Erwin) |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Diana B Foster. See document #1 -8 for image. (cdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
