SM Medical Holdings Corporation v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas
SM Medical Holdings Corporation |
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas |
3:2020cv02017 |
July 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Brantley Starr |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 3:20-cv-2017-X consolidated with lead case 3:20-cv-1885-M. Member case administratively closed following consolidation. Further docketing should be in lead case 3:20-cv-1885-M. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 8/28/2020) (ndt) |
Civil Case Terminated per 29 Order consolidating cases with 3:20-cv-1885-M. (ndt) |
Filing 4 ORDER: No later than 21 days from the date of this order, plaintiff must file an amended complaint that alleges diversity of citizenship, in conformity of 28 U.S.C. 1332; otherwise, this action will be dismissed without prejudice for want of subject matter jurisdiction (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 8/12/2020) (axm) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas. (hml) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by SM Medical Holdings Corporation. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-11037181) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Additional Page(s)) (Fronda, Matthew) |
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (See document #1 for Image) by SM Medical Holdings Corporation. (hml) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SM Medical Holdings Corporation v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SM Medical Holdings Corporation | |
Represented By: | Mark W Stout |
Represented By: | Matthew B Fronda |
Represented By: | Matthew Dennis Giadrosich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.