Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SM MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS
as 3:2024cv04483
Plaintiff:
SM MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF HIDALGO COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES FOUNDATION D/B/A SOUTH TEXAS AIRMED
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SM Medical Holdings Corporation v. Assured Benefits Administrators, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
SM Medical Holdings Corporation
Defendant:
Assured Benefits Administrators, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SM MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION v. CHRISTIAN BROTHERS SERVICES et al
as 4:2021cv00275
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE and others
Cross Defendant:
Great American Insurance Company, CHRISTIAN BROTHERS SERVICES and Nationwide
Plaintiff:
SM MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
SM MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION v. CHRISTIAN BROTHERS SERVICES et al
as 3:2020cv10801
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION, NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE, FRATES BENEFITS ADMINISTRATORS and others
Plaintiff:
SM MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SM Medical Holdings Corporation v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas
as 3:2020cv02017
Plaintiff:
SM Medical Holdings Corporation
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SM Financial Services Corporation v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas
as 3:2020cv01885
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas and Health Care Service Corporation a Mutual Legal Reserve Company doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas
Plaintiff:
SM Financial Services Corporation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
SM Medical Holdings Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
