Baker v. Deere and Company
| Robert "Mike" Baker, Robert Baker, Wendy Baker and Mike |
| Deere and Company doing business as John Deere Company |
| 3:2021cv00754 |
| March 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPLY filed by Deere and Company re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Claims in Plaintiffs' Original Complaint (Zinnecker, Ben) |
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on 10/3/2022 before Judge David C Godbey. The setting is for a one week docket. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 5/21/2021) (twd)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STATUS ON STATUS, SCHEDULING, AND RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE filed by Robert Baker, Wendy Baker. (Burkhead, John) |
| Filing 12 Appendix in Support filed by Robert Baker, Wendy Baker re: #11 Response. (Burkhead, John) Modified text on 5/10/2021 (mjr). |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Robert Baker, Wendy Baker re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Claims in Plaintiffs' Original Complaint (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss) (Burkhead, John) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deere and Company. (Blackerby, Chris) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order regarding the following matters, and report to the Court within 14 days after the conference the parties' position. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 4/26/2021) (twd)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Claims in Plaintiffs' Original Complaint filed by Deere and Company Attorney Ben T Zinnecker added to party Deere and Company(pty:dft) (Zinnecker, Ben) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Deere and Company; served on 4/2/2021. (mjr) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Deere and Company. (ykp) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Robert Baker, Wendy Baker. (Burkhead, John) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Robert "Mike" Baker. (Burkhead, John) Modified text on 4/1/2021 (mjr). |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Robert "Mike" Baker. (Burkhead, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Deere and Company filed by Robert "Mike" Baker. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11753848) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Burkhead, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
