Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00469
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Collins et al
as 2:2026cv01589
Plaintiff:
Russel Johnson
Defendant:
Kairon Collins, Terri Perry, PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jordan v. Wren et al
as 4:2026cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jordan, Jr.
Defendant:
Superintendent Sequeia Wren, Mike Dixon, Commissioner Burl Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
United States of America v. Ebady (Tsikman)
as 26-2011
Defendant:
HAFIZULLAH EBADY, DELA SAIDAZIM, DAVID GARY BISHOFF and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Puente v. Picard et al
as 4:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mike Nava Puente
Defendant:
Ryan Picard, Shayden Nagle, Gabe Klepich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
White v. Gibilisco, et al.
as 26-4676
Plaintiff:
WILSON LEBRANDON WHITE
Defendant:
MIKE GIBILISCO, C/O, Shasta County Jail, ZACHARY LARSEN, C/O, Shasta County Jail, AUSTIN DUNHAM, C/O, Shasta County Jail and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Lewis v. Dunleavy et al
as 3:2026cv00273
Plaintiff:
Tamisha Lewis
Defendant:
Mike Dunleavy, Office of Children Services and U.S. Air Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00496
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.