Johnson v. LNU
Jaret Johnson and Jamil J Shabazz-El |
FNU LNU |
3:2021cv01696 |
July 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sam A Lindsay |
Rebecca Rutherford |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Mail returned as undeliverable. #6 Findings and Recommendations on Case received back from Jaret Johnson as Not in Custody. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (jmg) |
Filing 7 Mail returned as undeliverable. #4 Order And Notice of Deficiency received back from Jaret Johnson as Return to Sender - Refused - Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (jmg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Aug 13 08:38:36 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should dismiss Johnson's case without prejudice under Rule 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 8/12/2021) (ygl) |
Filing 5 Mail returned as undeliverable. #1 Consent Form, #2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party received back from Jaret Johnson as Refused - unable to forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (mjr) |
Filing 4 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Jaret Johnson must address the following deficiency: Complaint is not in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). The $402 fee has not been paid nor has a proper request to proceed informa pauperis been submitted. A request to proceed in forma pauperis must include a certified statement of the balance in plaintiff's inmate trust account for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(2). Civil rights pleadings are not filed on the appropriate form. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 8/25/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 7/26/2021) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner IFP Form, #2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 8, #3 Civil Rights Complaint) (ygl) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Mon Jul 26 09:55:16 CDT 2021 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri Jul 23 11:31:43 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against FNU LNU filed by Jaret Johnson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.