Laster v. Boyle et al
Plaintiff: Shermaine Laster
Defendant: Jane J Boyle, Melanie Smith, FBI, Limestone County Detention Center, Ken Paxton and US Marshals
Case Number: 3:2021cv02525
Filed: October 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sidney A Fitzwater
Referring Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FILING FEE ORDER: The Court, having considered plaintiff's motion in light of the PLRA, hereby ORDERS as follows Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. in amount of $0 with a balance of $350 remaining. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 11/23/2021) (ykp)
November 23, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Tue Nov 23 13:00:04 CST 2021 (crt)
November 19, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shermaine Laster. (oyh) Docket text modified on 11/23/2021 (twd).
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Shermaine Laster must address the following deficiency: Request to proceed in forma pauperis and include a certified statement of the balance in plaintiff's inmate trust account for the sixth-month period preceding the filing of the complaint or pay the $402 filing fee. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 11/22/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/21/2021) (Attachments: #1 IFP) (jmg)
October 21, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Oct 21 08:51:44 CDT 2021 (crt)
October 14, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu Oct 14 16:11:18 CDT 2021 (crt)
October 13, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shermaine Laster. (jmg)
October 13, 2021 Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Jane J Boyle, FBI, Limestone County Detention Center, Ken Paxton, Melanie Smith, US Marshals filed by Shermaine Laster. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg)
October 13, 2021 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg)
October 13, 2021 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laster v. Boyle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shermaine Laster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane J Boyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melanie Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FBI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Limestone County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ken Paxton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Marshals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?