Broadfield v. Garland et al
Petitioner: Brian Broadfield
Respondent: Merrick Garland and Michael Carvajal
Case Number: 3:2022cv00301
Filed: February 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David L Horan
Referring Judge: Brantley Starr
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OBJECTION to #7 Findings and Recommendations by Brian Broadfield. (mla)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Case: The Court should dismiss this case without prejudice. Any party who objects to any part of these findings, conclusions, and recommendation must file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 2/9/2022) (jmg)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed Feb 9 15:33:22 CST 2022 (crt)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Case reassigned to Judge Brantley Starr per Special Order 3-340. Senior Judge A. Joe Fish no longer assigned to the case. (rekc)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Tue Feb 8 13:09:28 CST 2022 (crt)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Brian Broadfield. (oyh)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Emergency MOTION for Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Brian Broadfield. (oyh)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Brian Broadfield. (oyh)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Brian Broadfield. (oyh)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (oyh)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Broadfield v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brian Broadfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Merrick Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Carvajal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?