Allen-Smith v. US Marshall et al
Joshua Allen-Smith |
US Marshall and FBI |
3:2024cv00362 |
February 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
A Joe Fish |
Renee Harris Toliver |
Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 JUDGMENT: It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3). The court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/18/2024) (ndt) |
Filing 11 Order Accepting #7 Findings and Recommendations. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/18/2024) (ndt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Mon Mar 18 16:26:05 CDT 2024 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Mon Mar 18 16:26:21 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 10 OBJECTION filed by Joshua Allen-Smith re: #7 Findings and Recommendations on Case. (agc) |
Filing 9 OBJECTION filed by Joshua Allen-Smith re: #7 Findings and Recommendations on Case. (agc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Wed Mar 6 09:56:35 CST 2024 (crt) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER terminating as moot ( #4 and #6 ) Plaintiff's Motions for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and to Appoint Counsel in light of the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed. In the event the District Judge declines to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to dismiss this action, Plaintiff may re-urge the motions. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 3/5/2024) (chmb) |
Filing 7 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Smiths complaint should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h) (3). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 3/1/2024) (kcr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Fri Feb 16 15:27:18 CST 2024 (crt) |
Filing 6 Request to Appoint Counsel filed by Joshua Allen-Smith. (kcr) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joshua Allen-Smith. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (kcr) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joshua Allen-Smith. (kcr) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against FBI, US Marshall filed by Joshua Allen-Smith. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kcr) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kcr) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.