McGruder v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Natasha McGruder
Defendant: Target Corporation
Not Classified By Court: ADR Provider
Case Number: 4:2020cv00990
Filed: September 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Before the Court is Target Corporation's Unopposed Motion to Enter Protective Order. ECF No. #8 . Having considered the motion, the Court finds that it should be and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to file the Protective Order attached to the motion (ECF No. 8-1) as an attachment to this Order. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/1/2020) (Attachments: #1 protective order) (tln)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this Court's four-week docket beginning 12/6/2021 before Judge Mark Pittman. Joinder of Parties due by 11/30/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 11/30/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 8/9/2021. In accordance with the Court's Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan, the Court hereby REFERS this case to mediation and APPOINTS Mr. Jason C. Nash as the mediator in this case. Deadline for mediation is on or before 6/9/2021. Discovery due by 7/9/2021. Pretrial Materials/Order due by 11/12/2021. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/1/2020) (tln)
September 22, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cain, Erwin)
September 22, 2020 Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Target Corporation. (Cain, Erwin)
September 8, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand filed by Target Corporation Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Cain, Erwin)
September 8, 2020 Filing 5 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Target Corporation re #4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cain, Erwin)
September 8, 2020 Filing 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Target Corporation (Cain, Erwin)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: The Joint Report shall be filed on or before September 25, 2020. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/3/2020) (tln)
September 2, 2020 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (tln)
September 2, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Target Corporation. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-11137849) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A Index, #2 Exhibit(s) B Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) C Tab 1 Original Petition, #4 Exhibit(s) C Tab 2 Citation, #5 Exhibit(s) C Tab 3 Return, #6 Exhibit(s) D Certificate of Interested Persons, #7 Cover Sheet, #8 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Cain, Erwin)
September 2, 2020 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS by Target Corporation. (see doc. #1 for image) (tln)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGruder v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Erwin A Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natasha McGruder
Represented By: Ben Eric Westbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: ADR Provider
Represented By: Jason Chad Nash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?