Tanner v. Walgreen Co.
Lartress Tanner |
Walgreen Co. |
4:2021cv01019 |
September 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Labor: Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/30/2021) (sre) |
Filing 4 ORDER: The Court strictly enforces its local rules. Because Plaintiff has failed to follow the Local Rules of the Northern District, the Court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/30/2021) (sre) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (tln) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Walgreen Co.. (Schmoyer, Shannon) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Walgreen Co.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12187387) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement, #4 Cover Sheet Supplement, #5 Additional Page(s) List of Counsel of Record, #6 Exhibit(s) 1-Original Petition, #7 Exhibit(s) 2-Citation, #8 Exhibit(s) 3-Answer, #9 Exhibit(s) 4-State Court Docket Sheet, #10 Exhibit(s) 5-State Court Notice of Removal, #11 Additional Page(s) Index of Matters Being Filed) (Schmoyer, Shannon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tanner v. Walgreen Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lartress Tanner | |
Represented By: | Wendell E Washington |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Walgreen Co. | |
Represented By: | Harrison Monfort Smith |
Represented By: | Shannon B. Schmoyer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.