Tanner v. Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff: Lartress Tanner
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Case Number: 4:2021cv01019
Filed: September 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/30/2021) (sre)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court strictly enforces its local rules. Because Plaintiff has failed to follow the Local Rules of the Northern District, the Court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/30/2021) (sre)
September 1, 2021 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (tln)
September 1, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Walgreen Co.. (Schmoyer, Shannon)
September 1, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Walgreen Co.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12187387) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement, #4 Cover Sheet Supplement, #5 Additional Page(s) List of Counsel of Record, #6 Exhibit(s) 1-Original Petition, #7 Exhibit(s) 2-Citation, #8 Exhibit(s) 3-Answer, #9 Exhibit(s) 4-State Court Docket Sheet, #10 Exhibit(s) 5-State Court Notice of Removal, #11 Additional Page(s) Index of Matters Being Filed) (Schmoyer, Shannon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tanner v. Walgreen Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lartress Tanner
Represented By: Wendell E Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Represented By: Harrison Monfort Smith
Represented By: Shannon B. Schmoyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?