Young v. The Kroger Co.
Brenda Young |
The Kroger Co. |
4:2022cv00897 |
October 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 FINAL JUDGMENT: This final judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. In accordance with the order dismissing the case issued on November 23, 2022, Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED without prejudice. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall transmit a true copy of this final judgment to the parties. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/23/2022) (sre) |
Filing 16 ORDER: Having considered the docket and this Courts practice of strictly enforcing the Local Rules,1. the Court concludes that dismissal is appropriate due to Plaintiffs failure to file the certificate of interested persons within 21 days of removal, her failure to comply with the Court's orders, and her failure to cure the noted deficiencies in her filings.2. The Court therefore ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/23/2022) (sre) |
Filing 15 First MOTION for Discovery Interrogatories filed by Brenda Young (Loreto, Vincent) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Brenda Young. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Loreto, Vincent) |
Filing 13 ORDER STRIKING AND UNFILING DOCUMENT: a #12 motion for leave to file amended complaint has been filed by Plaintiff and is considered deficient in the area noted below: "When a party files an untimely motion for leave to amend and does not address the good cause standard under Rule 16(b)(4), this court typically denies the motion for that reason alone." Sterling v. United States, No. 3:18-CV-0526, 2020 WL 470232, at *1 (N.D. Tex. 2020) (quotation omitted). Plaintiff did not address the good cause standard in its motion. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/14/2022) (mmw) |
Filing 12 ***STRICKEN and UNFILED per #13 ORDER***First MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Brenda Young (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit(s)) (Loreto, Vincent) Modified on 11/14/2022 (mmw). |
Filing 11 Order Unfiling #8 Amended Complaint filed by Brenda Young due to the following deficiency: Plaintiff did not comply with the Court's order requiring the amended complaint to be filed by October 21, 2022. ECF No. #4 . Plaintiff's amended complaint was filed two weeks past the October 21 deadline. See ECF No. #8 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/10/2022) (wxc) |
Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order filed by The Kroger Co.. (Blanton, Christopher) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint,, filed by The Kroger Co.. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Briscoe, B) |
Filing 8 *** UNFILED PER ORDER #11 *** AMENDED COMPLAINT against The Kroger Co. filed by Brenda Young. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Loreto, Vincent) Modified on 11/10/2022 (wxc). |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Brenda Young. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Loreto, Vincent) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vincent Alexander Loreto on behalf of Brenda Young. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Loreto, Vincent) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Joint Report shall be filed on or before November 8, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/11/2022) (mmw) |
Filing 4 ORDER...the Court ORDERS that: (1) by October 21, 2022, Plaintiff file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the undersigneds judge-specific requirements; and (2) within 14 days after Plaintiff files the amended complaint, but no later than November 4, 2022, Defendant file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/7/2022) (wxc) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The Kroger Co.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Blanton, Christopher) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by The Kroger Co.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13207216) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Cover Sheet, #4 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Briscoe, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Young v. The Kroger Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brenda Young | |
Represented By: | Zohra I Mavani |
Represented By: | Vincent Alexander Loreto |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Kroger Co. | |
Represented By: | B Kyle Briscoe |
Represented By: | Christopher M Blanton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.