Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. Renewal By Andersen, LLC, et al.
as 24-6095
Defendant:
RIVER CITY WINDOW AND DOOR, INC., RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN, LLC and ANDERSEN CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BRENDA YOUNG
Young v. Renewal By Andersen, LLC, et al.
as 24-5950
Petitioner:
RIVER CITY WINDOW AND DOOR, INC., ANDERSEN CORPORATION and RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN, LLC
Respondent:
BRENDA YOUNG
Young v. Renewal by Andersen, LLC et al
as 2:2024at00783
Plaintiff:
Brenda Young
Defendant:
Renewal By Andersen, LLC, Andersen Corporation and River City Window and Door, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Young v. Renewal by Andersen, LLC et al

as 2:2024cv01759
Defendant:
River City Window and Door, Inc., Renewal By Andersen, LLC and Andersen Corporation
Plaintiff:
Brenda Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Young v. Fidelity Life Association
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Brenda Young
Defendant:
Fidelity Life Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Young v. The Kroger Co.
as 4:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Brenda Young
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
YOUNG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv17572
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BRENDA YOUNG
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ledford v. Hospice of New York, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv07040
Defendant:
Jone and John #2-13 Does, Judith Gayle, Teresa Quinones and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Ledford
Young v. Hy-Vee, Inc. et al

as 4:2019cv00699
Defendant:
Gayla Faelske and Hy-Vee, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brenda Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.