Simpson et al v. Bridgeport Correctional Center
Plaintiff: Robert Simpson and Randy Brooks
Defendant: Linda Thomas
Case Number: 4:2023cv00445
Filed: May 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Court's order of dismissal entered this day, it is the final judgment of the Court that Petitioners Ex Parte Application for Issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum under 28 U.S.C. 2241(c)(5) is DISMISSED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 5/24/2023) (tjc) Modified on 5/24/2023 (tjc).
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: After reviewing Petitioners' pleadings, the applicable law, and the procedural posture of Stills on PACER, the Court, at this time, declines to exercise any authority it may have to issue such a writ. The Court DISMISSES Petitioners' application. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 5/23/2023) (tjc)
May 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Thomas Harold Osborn. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 5/12/2023) (chmb) Modified on 5/12/2023 (fba).
May 4, 2023 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre)
May 4, 2023 Filing 3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-13716015) filed by Randy Brooks, Robert Simpson (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing) (Osborn, Thomas)
May 4, 2023 Filing 2 Memorandum in Support of #1 Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert Simpson, Randy Brooks. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here..) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Osborn, Thomas) Modified on 5/4/2023 (sre).
May 4, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert Simpson, Randy Brooks. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $5; receipt number ATXNDC-13715954) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Osborn, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpson et al v. Bridgeport Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Simpson
Represented By: Tory Alexander Cronin
Represented By: Christopher Napolitano
Represented By: Thomas Harold Osborn
Represented By: Christopher M Napolitano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy Brooks
Represented By: Tory Alexander Cronin
Represented By: Christopher Napolitano
Represented By: Thomas Harold Osborn
Represented By: Christopher M Napolitano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linda Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?