Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kenneth Simpson v. Mark King
as 26-2152
Petitioner:
Kenneth Robert Simpson
Respondent:
Mark King, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Kenneth Simpson v. Mark King, et al
as 26-1633
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robert Simpson
Defendant:
Mark King, Warden, A. D. Iorio, Unit manager and R. Carpenter, Case manager
SIMPSON v. AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK
as 2:2025cv01620
Plaintiff:
Robert Simpson
Defendant:
American Express National Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Simpson v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2025cv01623
Plaintiff:
Robert Simpson
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Kenneth Simpson v. C.M. Willoughby
as 25-2720
Petitioner:
Kenneth Robert Simpson
Respondent:
C.M. Willoughby
Scott et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11521
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Scott, Paula Scott, Tampa Scott and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Simpson v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2025cv11896
Plaintiff:
Robert Simpson
Defendant:
Sheryl Gonzalez and FNU Joseph
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Simpson v. Zenith Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00339
Plaintiff:
Robert Simpson
Defendant:
Zenith Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Tieman et al v. American Risk Services, LLC et al
as 4:2025cv00246
Plaintiff:
Howard Tieman, John M Edgar, John M. Edgar, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Risk Services, LLC, Robert Simpson, Scott W Satterthwaite and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
