Patrick v. Payne et al
Dorothy L. Patrick |
Mark Payne, Tony Skinner and Kacy Mohead |
4:2024cv00114 |
February 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Jeffrey L Cureton |
Mark Pittman |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton per 12 order. (saw) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER Vacating the Court's 3/20/2024 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation [doc. 10] that recommended dismissal due to the delay of the Clerk's office in timely docketing the Amended Complaint when it was received on 3/18/2024 (but not docketed until 3/21/2024). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 3/21/2024) (chmb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:NEF of 12 Electronic Order. Thu Mar 21 11:17:23 CDT 2024 (crt) Modified docket text on 3/21/2024 (bdb). |
Filing 10 ***VACATED PER 12 ORDER*** ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL AND RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE: The Court RECOMMENDS that the above-styled and numbered cause be DISMISSED for failing to comply with the Court's #9 order. It is further ORDERED that the above-styled and numbered action be and hereby is returned to the docket of the United States District Judge. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton no longer assigned to case. Objections to F&R due by 4/3/2024 (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 3/20/2024) (saw) Modified on 3/21/2024 (saw). |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Wed Mar 20 11:09:13 CDT 2024 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Wed Mar 20 11:09:14 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kacy Mohead, Mark Payne, Tony Skinner filed by Dorothy L. Patrick. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (saw) |
Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FORM AMENDED COMPLAINT: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff, no later than March 18, 2024, shall file a fully completed amended complaint form with any attachment pages in accordance with the terms of this Order. Failure to timely file an amended complaint could result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice for lack of prosecution without further notice. Service of process on any potential Defendant will be withheld pending review of the amended complaint and any attachments thereto. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 3/4/2024) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Amended Complaint Form) (saw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Mon Mar 4 14:31:52 CST 2024 (crt) |
Filing 8 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL: Pending before the Court is a form Motion for the Appointment of Counsel [doc. #4 ]. The Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel should be and is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 2/13/2024) (saw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Tue Feb 13 11:07:22 CST 2024 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Feb 8 08:36:23 CST 2024 (crt) |
Filing 7 ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff #2 leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Service of process shall be withheld pending judicial screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 2/7/2024) (saw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. Tue Feb 6 19:59:19 CST 2024 (crt) |
Filing 6 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdb) |
Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Jeffrey L. Cureton assigned preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (bdb) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Dorothy L. Patrick (bdb) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dorothy L. Patrick. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (bdb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Dorothy L. Patrick (bdb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Kacy Mohead, Mark Payne, Tony Skinner filed by Dorothy L. Patrick. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.