Cases 1 - 10 of 28
VANDERPOOL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. VANDERPOOL, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, MARK PAYNE, JAY HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payne v. Mobile Mini, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02017
Plaintiff:
Mark Payne
Defendant:
Mobile Mini, Inc. and Mobile Mini, Inc. doing business as Mobile Mini Storage Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Payne v. Freeman Transit, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02113
Plaintiff:
Mark Payne
Defendant:
Freeman Transit, LLC and Christopher Freeman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Washington v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv01409
Defendant:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Company, Timco Logistics Systems, Inc., Mark Payne Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Dejia Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01844
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MARK PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03059
Plaintiff:
THELMORE CUMBY, AUSTIN DYER, SETH SOUTHERLAND and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02024
Plaintiff:
Thelmore Cumby, Austin Dyer, Seth Southerland and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
HOWARD v. DANCOR TRANSIT INC et al
as 4:2017cv00417
Defendant:
DANCOR TRANSIT INC and MARK PAYNE
Plaintiff:
ZICARRA HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disability Rights North Carolina v. Payne
as 5:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights North Carolina
Defendant:
Mark Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
