Collins v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Dorothy Yvonne Collins
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 5:2010cv00151
Filed: September 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Lubbock Office
County: Lubbock
Presiding Judge: Sam R Cummings
Presiding Judge: Nancy M Koenig
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the 22 Report and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court and that the above-styled and -numbered cause is hereby DISMISSED (Ordered by Judge Sam R Cummings on 11/18/2011) (cb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorothy Yvonne Collins
Represented By: Baynetta McCurry Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?