Garcia v. Walker et al
Noe Garcia |
The City of Lubbock, TX, Stuart Walker and City Codes Department |
5:2019cv00058 |
March 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sam R Cummings |
Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Supplemental Document by Noe Garcia as to #10 Amended Complaint. (bmg) |
Filing 12 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court hereby sua sponte ORDERS that this civil action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's #3 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, filed March 25, 2019, is hereby DENIED AS MOOT following the dismissalof this civil action. If so desired, Plaintiff may refile this civil action in a state court of general jurisdiction. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 4/12/2019) (krd) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Fri Apr 12 10:32:26 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Process of city employees filed by Noe Garcia (bmg) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against City Codes Department, Stuart Walker filed by Noe Garcia. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bmg) |
Filing 9 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court hereby sua sponte ORDERS that Plaintiff file an amended complaint on or before April 12, 2019, therein satisfying the pleading standards imposed by Rule 8(a). Plaintiff is hereby advised that failing to comply with this Court's Order will result in the dismissal of this civil action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. (Reply deadline to file amended complaint set 04/12/2019) (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 3/26/2019) (krd) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 3/26/2019) (krd) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8,9. Tue Mar 26 13:59:04 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Filing 7 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bmg) |
Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bmg) |
Filing 5 Declaration in Support filed by Noe Garcia re #4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel (bmg) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Noe Garcia (bmg) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Noe Garcia (bmg) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Noe Garcia. (bmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against The City of Lubbock, TX, Stuart Walker filed by Noe Garcia. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (bmg) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/25/2019) (bmg). |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Mon Mar 25 15:39:25 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.