Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Garcia Sarmiento v. Garland
as 23-2079
Petitioner: FABIO NOE GARCIA SARMIENTO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Ana Ozuna v. The United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09059
Plaintiff: Ana Ozuna
Defendant: United States Postal Service, Angel Noe Garcia, Does 1 through 20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Abimael Enrique Corea Lopez et al v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09080
Plaintiff: Abimael Enrique Corea Lopez, Adan Edilber Cuadra Mejia, Adolfo Bladimiro Flores Cruz and others
Defendant: Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Garcia Cabrera v. Garland
as 21-1240
Petitioner: GERARDO NOE GARCIA CABRERA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv82296
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: NOE GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia Sarmiento v. Barr
as 20-1679
Petitioner: FABIO NOE GARCIA SARMIENTO
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45588
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: NOE GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00251
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garcia v. Walker et al
as 5:2019cv00058
Plaintiff: Noe Garcia
Defendant: The City of Lubbock, TX, Stuart Walker and City Codes Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Noe Garcia-Lima We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-50242
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: NOE GARCIA-LIMA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?