Preston v. Rowe
Kenith R Preston |
Kelly Rowe |
5:2021cv00201 |
September 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Petitioner did not file the petition for writ of habeas corpus on the appropriate form. Nor did he pay the required $5.00 filing fee or submit a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) along with a certified statement of his inmate trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). Therefore, Petitioner is ORDERED (1) to complete and return the enclosed form used in this Court for actions filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241, and (2) to pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit an IFP application with the required certificate of inmate trust account, by October 25, 2021 (30 days). Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).WITH The Clerk is directed to provide to Petitioner, with service of this order, a form IFP application, a certificate of inmate trust account, and a standard form petition for cases filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (labeled amended). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 9/23/2021) (chmb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Sep 23 13:58:49 CDT 2021 (crt) The Clerk provided to Petitioner, with service of this order, a (long) form IFP application, a standard form petition for cases filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (labeled amended) Modified text on 9/23/2021 (krr). |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (krr) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr) Modified text on 9/22/2021 (krr). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kenith R Preston. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (krr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/22/2021: #1 Evidence) (krr). |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3. Wed Sep 22 16:17:50 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Preston v. Rowe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Kenith R Preston | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Kelly Rowe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.