Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Herrera v. Brummett et al
as 5:2026cv00275
Defendant:
LNU 5:26-cv-275-3 FNU, M. Orr, LNU 5:26-cv-275-2 FNU and others
Plaintiff:
Pimenio Vela Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera v. Brummett
as 26-10990
Defendant:
Nurse Witnny, Smart Communication, FNU Hinsley and others
Plaintiff:
Pimenio Vela Herrera, also known as Manuel Herrera, also known as Manny V., also known as Robbin Hood
Olivarez v. Rowe
as 5:2026cv00096
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Petitioner:
Jae Olivarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Perez v. Rowe et al
as 5:2026cv00092
Plaintiff:
Israel Perez
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Juan Bueno, Fernando Portillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herrera v. Brummett et al
as 5:2026cv00089
Plaintiff:
Pimenio Vela Herrera, Manuel Herrera, Manny V and others
Defendant:
Tom W. Brummett, Mar J. Hocker, Kelly Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Rowe
as 4:2026cv00475
Petitioner:
Bennie Lee Collins
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Rowe
as 5:2026cv00098
Petitioner:
Bennie Lee Collins
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bridges v. Lubbock County Detention Center et al
as 1:2026cv00165
Plaintiff:
Quinton Bridges
Defendant:
Lubbock County Detention Center and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vinson v. Rowe et al
as 5:2025cv00153
Plaintiff:
Aaron Vinson
Defendant:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe, Deputy FNU Portillo, Sargent Deputy FNU Scarbough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mongeau v. United States et al
as 5:2025cv00091
Defendant:
United States, C. Robinson, FNU Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Mongeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
