Woodson v. Brannan, et al
| Kaylee Brannan, Angela Montemayor, Lubbock County, Chaplain P Halford, Sgt. Tracy Marie Sasin, Lubbock Police Department Chief of Police, Ashley Hyppolite, Tammy Smith and Paige Reeder |
| Marcus D Woodson |
| Kelly Rowe |
| 5:2022cv00070 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Prisoner does NOT Consent by Marcus D Woodson to Trial by United States Magistrate Judge. (lkw) |
Filing 14
FEE ORDER: denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court orders Woodson pay the $402.00 filing fee within 20 days of the date of this order if he wishes to pursue this civil action. Failure to pay the fee will result in the dismissal of Woodson's complaint for want of prosecution without further notice. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 5/26/2022) (bdg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14. Thu May 26 11:52:22 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 13 Public correspondence filed, deputy clerk response attached, received from Marcus D Woodson. Courtesy copy of docket sheet mailed to Mr. Woodson. (Attachments: #1 Clerks Letter) (bdg) |
|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 5/20/2022) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Electronic Order mailed to Mr. Woodson Fri May 20 12:20:16 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 11 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (lkw) |
| Filing 10 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (lkw) (Main Document 10 replaced with correct consent form on 5/19/2022) (lkw). |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Marcus D Woodson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (lkw) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9,10,11. Thu May 19 14:41:52 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REDESIGNATE CASE: Woodson is advised that the Court intends to construe this habeas petition as a civil-rights complaint. Woodson must respond to this order-indicating his acceptance ofor objection to the Court's intended classification of this case-within 30 days. Woodson's application to proceed in forma pauperis will remain pending until the Court determines the nature of his suit. The Clerk shall mail Woodson a prisoner civil-rights complaint form marked "amended" and stamped with this cause number. Woodson's failure to respond to this order may result in the dismissal of this civil case without further notice. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 5/10/2022) (lkw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. along with Civil Rights Complaint for marked "AMENDED" Tue May 10 14:46:11 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 7 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Petitioner Marcus D Woodson. (lkw) (Main Document 7 replaced to darken page on 4/28/2022) (lkw). |
| Filing 6 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Petitioner Marcus D Woodson. (lkw) |
| Filing 5 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Petitioner Marcus D Woodson. (lkw) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bmh) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (bmh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Marcus D. Woodson. (bmh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Marcus D Woodson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bmh) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,4. Mon Apr 18 15:07:51 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
