Woodson v. Rowe
Marcus D Woodson |
Kelly Rowe |
5:2022cv00088 |
May 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the Court's order entered today, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without prejudice on exhaustion and abstention grounds. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 5/25/2022) (bdg) |
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS: For the reasons discussed above, Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is dismissed without prejudice on exhaustion and abstention grounds. Any civil- rights claims are dismissed without prejudice to being refiled in a procedurally correct manner. Any request for a certificate of appealability should be denied. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 5/25/2022) (bdg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Wed May 25 11:17:47 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt No. #5 , is GRANTED until further order. Reminder: Petitioner must promptly notify the Court of any change of address by filing a written notice of change of address with the Clerk. Failure to file this notice may result in the dismissal of the petition for failure to prosecute.. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 5/17/2022) (chmb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Mailed copy of NEF - Doc. No. 6. Tue May 17 10:11:38 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marcus D Woodson. (bdg) |
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdg) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (bdg) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Trust Account by Marcus D Woodson LCDC # 79520. (bdg) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Marcus D Woodson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Restricted Attachment) (bdg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,4. Thu May 12 11:23:20 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Woodson v. Rowe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Marcus D Woodson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Kelly Rowe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.