Johnson v. Seagraves Compress
| Kenneth Johnson |
| Seagraves Compress |
| 5:2023cv00209 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| D Gordon Bryant |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Supplemental Complaint by Kenneth Johnson as to #1 Complaint. (krr) |
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court ORDERS Johnson to file an amended complaint no later than October 25, 2023, stating the following: (1) the date he was fired; (2) whether he filed a claim with the EEOC or TWC and, if so, when that claim was filed; and (3) whether he received a right-to-sue letter from one of those agencies. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further notice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr. on 10/6/2023) (krr)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER PERMITTING FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS: Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Kenneth Johnson's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and supporting documentation. ECF No. #2 . After reviewing the motion, the undersigned hereby GRANTS Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr. on 10/6/2023) (krr)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6. Fri Oct 6 16:18:40 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (krr) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Bryant (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kenneth Johnson. (krr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Seagraves Compress filed by Kenneth Johnson. (Filed in person, over the counter) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet) (krr) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3,4. Thu Sep 7 15:48:31 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Seagraves Compress | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenneth Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Seagraves Compress | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
